Revit 2010: epic fail?

Anonymous · ‎2009-04-21

Hi there ArchiCADers... news from the wild world of Revit!

Revit 2010 has just hit the streets, and implanted face first. So much for crowd surfing: this release was panned before it was released and now enjoys widespread scorn from the user community. Long time Revit users, ex-Autodesk employees, experts and implementers, and representatives from the Revit user community have all come to the conclusion that Revit 2010 sucks. There are a few that are supporting it on AUGI, so the hate isn't universal.

I'm a little stunned at the response, and not sure if it's warranted. Revit is in the middle of a UI facelift (evidently the developers are Ribbon haters -- it was forced on them by management), and its graphic engine is being replaced by one supporting DirectX 9. It's faster than 2009, but no one seems to care. It's that Revit Architecture got a few scant features in this release and an interface the majority didn't ask for.

Like you, we have a wishlist a mile long of items large and small. And most of those wishes remain unmet after half a dozen releases. It's customer relationship management 101: give the paying customer what they want. Talk to them before you force-feed them a new interface. And frankly, Autodesk has missed doing that so badly that some users are openly talking about bailing on Revit and trying something else.

Arrogance, incompetence, or did they just not see this coming? The user community would say either of the first two, and it's not pretty. I think it's a combination of management making a bad call and then not anticipating that the user community would blow their stack. But our users have been waiting for ages for some long-standing wishes to be fulfilled, and release after release, they don't show up. Patience evaporates, and now it's gone.

It's good news for you folks, because every time Autodesk screws up this badly, the sun shines a lighter brighter on you all.

Side note: Aaron Bourgoin, a local VW user and myself will be making a presentation to the Architectural Institute of British Columbia on how you can do BIM with AC, VW and Revit. Perhaps the field is leveling a bit?

AUGI appears to be down right now, but I'll post some links later showing how rabid our members are. We're a scary lot, I tell you!

owen · ‎2009-04-22

TomWaltz wrote:
Revit 2010 kind of reminds me of Archicad 12. It has a couple new features that the manufacturer RAVES about, and the users kind of said "OK, that's nice. Where's the rest of the new features?"

AC12 had multi-processor support which IMO was alone worth the upgrade. Although AC is still not 100% MP capable it has made a big improvement in performance. Revit is still not multi-processor capable - something i would think is a really big deal given AC is and 4+ cores are now almost a standard workstation config.

So what is the one 'big' feature in Revit 2010 aside from the new UI?. I would say the massing tool looks like it, but i have not had the chance to play around with Revit 2010 yet so i really can't judge. It looks like it would be incredibly useful if you do that kind of work, but i guess useless otherwise?

cheers,

Owen Sharp

Design Technology Manager
fjmt | francis-jones morehen thorp

iMac 27" i7 2.93Ghz | 32GB RAM | OS 10.10 | Since AC5

Bricklyne Clarence · ‎2009-04-22

owen wrote:
.......

AC12 had multi-processor support which IMO was alone worth the upgrade. ......... Revit is still not multi-processor capable - something i would think is a really big deal given AC is and 4+ cores are now almost a standard workstation config...........

On the flip side, AC is not a 64-bit application, whereas I think Revit 2010 gives you the option of installing as a 32-bit or a 64-bit app.

This obviously means that AC tops out at 4GB of RAM ( if that) regardless of whether or not you have more, and IMO this is more crucial in AC than in Revit given how AC handles information and the model in general. ( think high polycount limits and crashes, which in turn limits the programs capacity to handle any level of complex model or modeling including those generated by the existing tools like the Curtain Wall and Complex Profiles.)

It also probably and partly explains why Revit is able to support more robust free-form modeling tools or at least massing tools, and complex relationships and constraints despite the seriously sucky 3D Engine (prior to v.2010's DirectX capable one).

I imagine its probably expensive to develop a 64bit app and/or dual-maintain it with the 32bit version, which is probably why GS have yet to do it ( and maybe the drivers issues), but given the fact tha Micrsoft are on record as stating that they will soon stop support and development for 32 bit versions of Windows in about 2-3 years time, it seems like a kinda critical thing for GS to address.

Maybe AC13 will be native 64bit capable, and make all this moot, but I did find it odd that they went multi-core before they developed a 64-bit native version.

Anonymous · ‎2009-04-22

I imagine its probably expensive to develop a 64bit app and/or dual-maintain it with the 32bit version,

No , its not. Generally you can design using definitions that take care of it and compile accordingly.

The hard thing is (and its really hard) to migrate from a pure 32bit code to a flexible one. Once you do it, then compiling for 32 64 or 128 bits its easy.

Anonymous · ‎2009-04-22

Revit, I think, has greater resource needs than AC. That's why we need the ridiculous amounts of RAM that we have -- so perhaps you're not hitting the 4Gb wall like so many Reviteers have? In any event: 2010 uses more RAM than any previous release, though 2009 often crashed on exit because of a suspected memory leak (we're not sure really).

Other than the massing and UI tools, there a number of useful improvements and a couple of extra features and a spot slope tool.

Revit uses multi processors for a number of tasks, and for rendering will use up to four cores, so Revit like AC is making use of MP where it can, and I'd expect both companies to continue investigations into how MP can be implemented.

Revit 2009's OpenGL graphics were slow -- no doubt about it. 2010 with DirectX is a lot better, but not a lot better than v2008; I don't understand what happened from 2008 to 2009... I will tell you that while views in Revit open in a fraction of the time AC12 does, once you get into that view, AC's display performance is as good (and I think faster) than Revit 2010.

As with any release we'll get service packs during the year and I fully expect 2010's display performance to improve.

The Ribbon is a another matter. There are those that like it (including people who don't have anything nice to say about Adesk -- ever), and those that absolutely hate it (especially in the context of other wish items being unmet). I think it was a bad idea -- but other than the Ribbon concept a lot of the other things Adesk has done with the UI have been good. However, all the other dialogs beyond that need serious help and not a lot was done to them in this release. Perhaps the new UI sets the stage for this to happen.

I am more productive in 2010 simply because of display performance; navigating the model is just that much faster. The Ribbon actually makes me slightly less productive but I'm a keyboarder and use any UI as little as I have to.

Anonymous · ‎2009-04-23

The Ribbon is a another matter. There are those that like it (including people who don't have anything nice to say about Adesk -- ever), and those that absolutely hate it (especially in the context of other wish items being unmet). I think it was a bad idea -- but other than the Ribbon concept a lot of the other things Adesk has done with the UI have been good. However, all the other dialogs beyond that need serious help and not a lot was done to them in this release. Perhaps the new UI sets the stage for this to happen.

Thats true. I am on on the ones who really like it.

Anonymous · ‎2009-06-24

Do Revit users have more money than ArchiCAD users? http://www.andekan.com/revit-families-content-pack

that almost seems a laughable amount to ask for some piping & toilet fixtures? From experience ArchiCAD users wouldn't even want to pay $399 (which i agree with).

owen · ‎2009-06-24

sdb wrote:
Do Revit users have more money than ArchiCAD users? http://www.andekan.com/revit-families-content-pack

that almost seems a laughable amount to ask for some piping & toilet fixtures? From experience ArchiCAD users wouldn't even want to pay $399 (which i agree with).

and we would definately not want to pay $3,999 .... that would get you a whole new seat of AC. Those objects would want to do you plumbing plans for you at that price.

W T F have those guys been smoking??

[EDIT:] OK bit slow this morning, been up all night ... i get it, you left one of the '9's out on purpose.

cheers,

Owen Sharp

Design Technology Manager
fjmt | francis-jones morehen thorp

iMac 27" i7 2.93Ghz | 32GB RAM | OS 10.10 | Since AC5

Anonymous · ‎2009-06-24

haha thanks owen.

yes i was really taken back by it. Surely they can't expect to sell ANY at that price. That's basically the same price as buying Revit or AC. ludicrous!

Rob · ‎2009-06-25

W T F have those guys been smoking??

looking at the price they surely must be surfing on a quality australian hydro pot.

::rk

Laszlo Nagy · ‎2009-06-25

Rob wrote:
W T F have those guys been smoking??
looking at the price they surely must be surfing on a quality australian hydro pot.

Respectfully, guys, drugs are not a fun thing at all. Millions of lives are ruined by them every year and this is no exaggeration.
So please skip such comments in the future.

Loving Archicad since 1995 - Find Archicad Tips at x.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac27

Find the next step in your career as a Graphisoft Certified BIM Coordinator!

Revit 2010: epic fail?

Still looking?

Browse more topics

See latest solutions

Start a new discussion!